It has often been said that there is a central paradox in the role of r throughout history: on the one hand, r has been the single greatest cause of war and suffering. On the other, it has been the source of redemption and liberation for humanity. How can we possibly make sense
Anything essential is invisible to the eyes?
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήhttp://2.bp.blogspot.com/_8sY9bx8acNM/SwCGxw3slPI/AAAAAAAAAf0/F6JPkTIBDKY/s320/Kapogiannis_2009_cortical_thickness.jpg
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήPhilosophers whose inspiration is more metaphysical and ontological, e.g. Heidegger, emphasize the development of Being from the perspective of the experiencing human being, and how the world is revealed to this experiencing entity within a realm of things. Pragmatic philosophers like Mead focus on the development of the self and the objectivity of the world within the social realm: that "the individual mind can exist only in relation to other minds with shared meanings" (Mead 1982: 5).
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήThe two most important roots of Mead's work, and of Symbolic interactionism in general are the philosophy of pragmatism and psychological behaviorism. Pragmatism is a wide ranging philosophical position from which several aspects of Mead's influences can be identified.
There are four main tenets of pragmatism: see Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy First, to pragmatists true reality does not exist "out there" in the real world, it "is actively created as we act in and toward the world. Second, people remember and base their knowledge of the world on what has been useful to them and are likely to alter what no longer "works." Third, people define the social and physical "objects" they encounter in the world according to their use for them. Lastly, if we want to understand actors, we must base that understanding on what people actually do. Three of these ideas are critical to symbolic interactionism: 1) the focus on the interaction between the actor and the world 2) a view of both the actor and the world as dynamic processes and not static structures and 3) the actor's ability to interpret the social world. Thus, to Mead and symbolic interactionists, consciousness is not separated from action and interaction, but is an integral part of both.
Mead's theories in part, based on pragmatism and behaviorism, was transmitted to many graduate students at the University of Chicago who then went on to establish symbolic interactionism.[14]
http://www.scottlondon.com/photo/burningman2009/images/BM2009_001.jpg
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήDr Hongsheng Zhao, of the university's SUPA Centre of Gravity said that an unknown force appears to be acting on dark matter within galaxies.
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήIt's sort of amazing out there. There is a refreshing lack of general whiny uptightedness. There is almost no fear of sex or inebriant or personal expression (to a fault), no brittle dogma, no two-faced political scandal, no shrill Republican screeching. There is no money changing hands, no economy per se, almost everything is free, including and especially the art, which is everywhere, and copious, and very much like nothing you will see anywhere else on the planet.
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήRead more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2009/08/28/notes082809.DTL#ixzz0XaSJx8Qf
Why no to take seriously the psyche of a man..why to think its ridiculous or its believes may strange. Its The second source
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφήhumans in 50,000 years have been domesticating. the bonobo pattern.. moving toward a form of ourselves with more and more juvenile behavior
ΑπάντησηΔιαγραφή