https://twitter.com/JillyLantang/status/1158627467877388288 mai be i will do it for her +.. but if get humiliated again https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5d1b34343fa03b00ad3c872f/verite-li-vy-putinu-5d5d68174e057700ad5e6c7a Twitter claims that they do not shadowban In a blog post from July 2018, Twitter claims that they do not shadowban by defining shadowbanning as deliberately making someone’s content undiscoverable to everyone except the person who posted it, unbeknownst to the original poster. If you strictly follow Twitter's own definition, this may not be false because the key is discoverability. Later, Twitter provides a hint why this definition is deceptive by stating that you are always able to see the tweets from accounts you follow (although you may have to do more work to find them, like go directly to their profile). The problem is obvious: Having to do more work to find tweets of accounts is not shadowbanning if you let Twitter define it. Although tweets within a thread may be completely invisible to others or tweets may not be shown in a user's followers' timelines, you will always be able to find those tweets by navigating to the user's "Tweets & replies" section on their profile. In contrast to Twitter, we find that this is shadowbanning because without navigating there, it is not even possible for others to know that the corresponding tweets do exist. and this is political most