i like Να έχεις μια όμορφη μέρα και να είσαι ζεστά ☺️you are going to meet.
Δευτέρα 25 Ιανουαρίου 2021
Kolkisiini (C22H25NO6) on alkaloidi, jota saadaan syysmyrkkyliljasta[1]. Kolkisiinia on käytetty niveltulehduksien[3], sydänpussitulehduksen ja familiaarisen välimeren kuumeen[4] hoitoon. Kolkisiinia käytetään myös kasvien kromosomiston monistamiseen. Esim. kahden eri viljakasvin risteymä on yleensä steriili, mutta kolkisiinikäsittelyllä siitä saadaan jälleen fertiili kahdentamalla sen kromosomisto, esimerkkinä ruisvehnä.
Kolkisiini estää mitoosin[5] kiinnittymällä tubuliiniin ja estämällä näin tumasukkulan syntymisen. Lisäksi aine estää neutrofiilien, siirtymistä ja fagosytoosin toimintaa ja vähentää kemotaktisen faktorin ja leukotrieeni B:n muodostumista[3]. ja se auttaa COVID 19 vastaan humttavasti valvotuissa olosuhteissa )greece
Πέμπτη 14 Ιανουαρίου 2021
The Chinese Bridge ("汉语桥" 世界大学生/中学生中文比赛) is an international Chinese speech competition for College and Upper Secondary School students. Confucius Institute organizes the Finnish preliminaries of the Chinese Bridge competition
Maailma on kaunis ja hyvä elää sille
Jolla on aikaa ja tilaa unelmille.
Ja mielen vapaus, ja mielen vapaus. aarne sareinen
Πέμπτη 7 Ιανουαρίου 2021
viittaanpa tämän vielä uudestaan, koska tuolla kanadalaisella patriootilla näyttäisi olevan jotenkin suomalaiselta kuulostava sukunimi - Tollikko.
some people ready . to stay inanother Country
Παρασκευή 1 Ιανουαρίου 2021
just a perfect day,i'm glad i spent it with you,oh such a perfect day you just keep me hangin on, τραγουδαμε κι ευχομαστε η νέα χρονιά να φερει στον καθένα μας πολλές τετοιες perfect days υγιαινετε
The decisiveness of the short period of colonialism and its negative consequences for Africa spring mainly from the fact that Africa lost power. Power is the ultimate determinant in human society, being basic to the relations within any group and between groups. It implies the ability to defend one's interests and if necessary to impose one's will by any means available.
Πέμπτη 31 Δεκεμβρίου 2020
Starting to suspect that this site has fostered some unhealthy social dynamics within the media class.
Suuret aineistot siirretään pankkien välillä öisin, jotta ne eivät rasita muita tietojärjestelmissä päivän aikana tapahtuvia tapahtumia, Finanssivalvonnan johtava riskiasiantuntija Anne Nisén sanoo.
Vaikka yöllä ruksuttavat järjestelmät ovatkin automaattisia, tarvitaan prosessissa ihmisen valvovaa silmää.
Πέμπτη 24 Δεκεμβρίου 2020
Τη περασμένη Πρωτοχρονιά κέρδισα το φλουρί. Για μένα τα πράγματα ήρθαν πολύ καλά. Για τον υπόλοιπο κόσμο βέβαια...Οπότε λέω να μη συμμετέχω καν αυτή τη φορά Kasvot onnenkyynelillä
I programmed a small device to be used in an IoT connected escape room for a course at my university. The device scanned different objects around the room, and then communicated different information to the user, or triggered different events in the room itself. The device was built on Arduino and Processing, and the API was built with OOCSI, an IoT framework built by/for the industrial design department at the TU/e. The main requirement for the device was a clear and concise API, as multiple other groups had to connect to the device to use it in the final project.
Τρίτη 22 Δεκεμβρίου 2020
key note speaker? You are not going with the flow. You are the flow. / Ph.D. in Philosophy / Poetess/ Lyricist.
nykyajan preachers .avantoni suureni melkein metrin pituiseksi sulan aikaa ja jäätyy taas.Tavallinen leski joka läski! Entinen hoitsu, nykyään IT-alan tunaroija. Omistaa idiootin koiran mutta rakastaa sitä paljon. Silleen kaksikielinenu valkeni varsin sateisena ja minun matematiikalla lämpötila oli alle 10 astetta. Yö oli taas mitä sattuu, itselle olisi kyllä uni maistunut, mutta jokainen valvoskeli ja kolisteli vuorotellen. Valpas vahtikoiramme teki hälytyksiä jatkuvasti ja kuuden jälkeen annoimme periksi ja julistimme aamun koittaneen.lllllllllllSylvi Kekkonen tyynnytteli miehensä kiukunpurkauksia ja sai tämän silottelemaan kirjoituksiaan, mutta toisaalta hänellä oli joskus hyvinkin kärkeviä mielipiteitä poliitikoista. Tamminiemen pesänjakajat -teoksessa todetaan, että Sylvi Kekkonen oli ainoa kriitikko, jota Urho Kekkonen kuunteli ja jonka mielipiteet hän otti huomioon.
42,300 results
Δευτέρα 21 Δεκεμβρίου 2020
Παρασκευή 18 Δεκεμβρίου 2020
Τετάρτη 26 Αυγούστου 2020
Τετάρτη 1 Ιουλίου 2020
all started in the Middle Ages, when parts of these lands were owned by the Dukes of Brabant and parts by the Lords of Breda, and later the House of Nassau. When Belgium and the Netherlands were formed, it became necessary to establish a border between the two countries. In Baarle, the demarcation was so confusing that a special border commission
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1JZAP_fiFI860FI860&sxsrf=ALeKk01WuEihspNPEwiDxmacvLshlRviqA:1593698657696&source=univ&tbm=isch&q=a2+milk&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiBufuS3q7qAhXBxaYKHSPzATAQsAR6BAgFEAE&biw=1368&bih=721 ...........................印度国内民族主义狂热很严重,尤其是莫迪上台以来推行的“印度教”民族主义政策!想让印度自己冷静下来不太可能也不现实!
Kielestä kiina kääntänyt
Nationalismin fanaattisuus Intiassa on erittäin vakava, etenkin "hindu" -natsionalismipolitiikka, jota Modi on toteuttanut virkaan ottamisensa jälkeen! On epätodennäköistä ja epärealistista haluta Intian rauhoittua!http://www.kupiainen.net/ajankohtaista.htm
Δευτέρα 29 Ιουνίου 2020
Around $24 billion of Venezuelan public money has been looted, and the Trump administration has used at least $601 million of it to construct a militarized wall on the US-Mexico border.
Παρασκευή 26 Ιουνίου 2020
folks - small confession - I hate social media algorithms. They promote only the most sensational. And that isn’t best. Oikealle osoittava nuoli So, I’m now giving out my special direct phone number for folks to SMS text me questions & to send out china special updates: +1 (703) 552-5771. ThreadKetju
The accusative case (abbreviated acc) of a noun is the grammatical case used to mark the direct object of a transitive verb. ... It is a noun that is having something done to it, usually used together (such as in Latin) with the nominative case. For example, "they" in English is nominative; "them" is accusative
Δευτέρα 22 Ιουνίου 2020
whys he so fullof positivity
the US never auntil now had war in china region so explain who is under it india klp. and the english 1600 killed all the millliom indiains.roger d).[2]
Shuler was arrested, charged with contempt of court (and also with resisting arrest; Shuler says he was beaten
Radio 4. CHINA With Mona Siddiqui, Andrew Doyle, Tim Stanley & Giles Fraser. #moralmaze
Radio 4. CHINA With Mona Siddiqui, Andrew Doyle, Tim Stanley & Giles Fraser. #moralmaze
Πέμπτη 18 Ιουνίου 2020
Un temps chagrin Mi figue mi raisin Un peu orphelins de lumière vive Les prés couchés Attendent un rayon de chaleur Pour relever le défi D'un printemps fini L'été chatouille Le vent amer magouille Avec les nuages boursoufflés Vite la fête de l'été Kamera salamallaHaute Loire Paysanne
https://www.google.com/search?q=gut+cells&rlz=1C1JZAP_fiFI860FI860&oq=gut+cell&aqs=chrome.0.0j69i57j0l6.3610j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Taiteilija Bror Zetterborg valitsi 1950-luvun alussa ensimmäistä kertaa sympaattisen pandan erään Panda-Pop –suklaalevyn kääreeseen. Pian kaikkiin tuotepakkauksiin lisättiin panda ja koska asiakkaatkin pitivät siitä, otettiin se koko tehtaan nimeksi! Pandan makeisten kysyntä kasvoi myös ulkomailla. Hollannissa, Norjassa, Ruotsissa ja Itävallassa arvostettiin laadukasta suklaata ja pehmeää lakritsaa. sareinen
Taiteilija Bror Zetterborg valitsi 1950-luvun alussa ensimmäistä kertaa sympaattisen pandan erään Panda-Pop –suklaalevyn kääreeseen. Pian kaikkiin tuotepakkauksiin lisättiin panda ja koska asiakkaatkin pitivät siitä, otettiin se koko tehtaan nimeksi! Pandan makeisten kysyntä kasvoi myös ulkomailla. Hollannissa, Norjassa, Ruotsissa ja Itävallassa arvostettiin laadukasta suklaata ja pehmeää lakritsaa. sareinen
Κυριακή 14 Ιουνίου 2020
Saxicola rubicola spp.rubicola (Ευρωπαικός Μαυρολαίμης) European Stonechat Sigri Old Sanatorium, 07.06.2020
Πέργαμος εξωραΐζεται και περιμένει τουρίστες
14/06/2020 - 18:02Ενημερώθηκε 14/06/2020 - 18:14
Στρατής ΠόθαςΣτρατής Πόθας
Κατηγορία
Οι εξ ανατολών... γείτονες
Ετικέτες
επικαιροτητα
Η αρχαία Πέργαμος που γνώρισε μεγάλη ακμή στα ελληνιστικά χρόνια βρισκόταν ανάμεσα στους δύο παραπόταμους του ποταμού Κάικου, του Σελινούντα και του Κητείου που σχημάτιζαν μια εύφορη κοιλάδα. Σήμερα τμήμα του Σελινούντα (Selinos kanal) όπως το αποκαλούν διέρχεται μέσα από τις αρχαιότητες και αποτελεί εστία σκουπιδιών και κάθε είδους περιβαλλοντικής όχλησης. Προς τούτο ο Δήμος Περγάμου υπέγραψε προγραμματική σύμβαση με τη Νομαρχία Σμύρνης για την ανάπλαση του χώρου και τη διευθέτηση του ρέματος ώστε να αποτελεί μέρος περιπάτου για τους κατοίκους και τους επισκέπτες. Ελπίζουν ότι γρήγορα θα αξιοποιηθεί το κέντρο της πόλης. Προσδοκώντας τους τουρίστες οι αρχές εναρμονισμένες στην εφαρμογή των μέτρων για τον κορονοϊό καθόρισαν για φέτος ταυτόχρονα στα μνημεία της πόλης 300 άτομα μάξιμουμ στην Ακρόπολη, 150 στο Ασκληπιείο, 80 στη Βασιλική του Αγ. Ιωάννη (Κιζίλ Αβλού) και 50 για το Μουσείο της Περγάμου. Εάν έχουν κοπεί υπεράριθμα εισιτήρια, θα περιμένουν για να τηρούνται τα μέτρα αποστάσεων.
Ανοίγουν δειλά-δειλά και στο Μοσχονήσι
Το «νησί» ή Cunda (Alibey), ένα από τα αγαπημένα τουριστικά σημεία της Τουρκίας, άρχισε να υποδέχεται επισκέπτες -εσωτερικός τουρισμός κυρίως- και μάλιστα αυτούς που διατηρούν εξοχικές κατοικίες εκεί, κάτοικοι της Πόλης και άλλων αστικών περιοχών.
Ο φίλος Ιμπραήμ Τσολάκ πρόεδρος των ξενοδόχων φιλοδοξεί και προσδοκά από την επόμενη βδομάδα να υποδεχθούν τους πρώτους πελάτες. Το ίδιο και η Emre Akyalı, πρόεδρος στο σύλλογο εστιατορίων και καφέ, εύχονται και ελπίζουν η άνοδος της θερμοκρασίας, ο περιορισμός των κρουσμάτων COVID-19 και η εφαρμογή των μέτρων προστασίας να φέρουν κόσμο και πελάτες! Βέβαια πολλοί ντόπιοι δεν κρύβουν την ανησυχία και τους φόβους για εξάπλωση της επιδημίας από τη μαζική έλευση και εγκατάσταση από τις μεγάλες πόλεις των ιδιοκτητών των εξοχικών κατοικιών στο Μοσχονήσι και το Αϊβαλί. Τώρα σε σχέση με τα δρομολόγια Μυτιλήνης-Αϊβαλί, όπως εκτιμούν αυτοί που ασχολούνται με τον τουρισμό, από 15 Ιουλίου
Παρασκευή 12 Ιουνίου 2020
e commercial use of exoskeletons in China began in the delivery industry. It helps to carry heavy loads and reduce damage to the lumbar spine during routine workTaputtavat kädet -mer
he is enemy of hthe Womeoon womeon women
are u enemy of the women. Misogyny manifests in numerous ways, including social exclusion, sex discrimination, hostility, androcentrism, patriarchy, male privilege, belittling of women, disenfranchisement of women, violence against women, and sexual objectification...............[Update: A post on female misogynists is now available.]MISTÄ VALLANKUMOUS ALKOI. "=dollarisetelistä
The misogynists. You may have heard of them. But what you may not realize is that they can be anywhere around you. They are notoriously hard to spot. They do not come with a label attached, and they may even come across as pro-woman.
In most cases, misogynists do not even know that they hate women. Misogyny is typically an unconscious hatred that men form early in life, often as a result of a trauma involving a female figure they trusted. An abusive or negligent mother, sister, teacher or girlfriend can plant a seed deep down in their brain’s subcortical matter.
Once planted, this seed will germinate and begin to grow, the tiny root working its way into the fear processing and memory areas of the brain as its tiny stem works its way into frontal areas of the brain, affecting emotion and rational decision-making.
The first signs of misogyny are barely noticeable, but with additional exposure to neglect, abuse, or lack of treatment, this behavioral seeding will grow larger and more prominent. But even when the misogyny reaches maturity and the tendency toward acting with hatred toward women can no longer be controlled, the misogynist and the women around him will often fail to notice the condition until it’s too late.
The following traits are typical of the misogynist:
He will zero in on a woman and choose her as his target. Her natural defenses may be down because he’s flirtatious, exciting, fun, and charismatic at first.
As time goes on, he begins to reveal a Jekyll & Hyde personality. He may change quickly from irresistible to rude, and from rude back to irresistible.
He will make promises to women and often fail to keep them. With men, on the other hand, he will almost always keep his word.
He will be late for appointments and dates with women, but be quite punctual with men.
His behavior toward women in general is grandiose, cocky, controlling, and self-centered.
He is extremely competitive, especially with women. If a woman does better than him socially or professionally, he feels terrible. If a man does better, he may have mixed feelings about it but he is able to look at the situation objectively.
He will unknowingly treat women differently from men in workplace and social settings, allowing men various liberties for which he will criticize female colleagues or friends.
He will be prepared (unconsciously) to use anything within his power to make women feel miserable. He may demand sex or withhold sex in his relationships, make jokes about women or put them down in public, “borrow” their ideas in professional contexts without giving them credit, or borrow money from them without paying them back.
On a date, he will treat a woman the opposite of how she prefers. If she is an old-style lady who prefers a "gentleman" who holds the door for her, orders for both and pays for the meal, he will treat her like one of his male buddies, order for himself, and let her pay for the whole meal if she offers (and sometimes even if she doesn’t). If she is a more independent type who prefers to order her own meal and pay for herself, he will rudely order for both and pay the check while she goes to the bathroom.
Sexually, he likes to control women and gives little or no attention to their sexual pleasure. Foreplay, if it occurs at all, is only a necessary means to an end. He likes oral sex but only as a recipient. His favorite positions enable him to avoid looking the woman in her eyes.
He will cheat on women he is dating or in a relationship with. Monogamy is the last thing he feels he owes a woman.
He may suddenly disappear from a relationship without ending it, but may come back three months later with an explanation designed to lure the woman back in.
Only rarely will a misogynist possess every one of these traits, which makes it harder to identify them. Their ability to lure women in with their charm and charisma adds to the difficulty of spotting the early-warning signs.
Women haters (unconsciously) get off on treating women badly. Every time they can put down a woman or hurt her feelings, they unconsciously feel good because deep down in their hidden brain, their bad behavior is rewarded with a dose of the pleasure chemical dopamine—which makes them want to repeat the behavior again and again.
are u enemy of the women. Misogyny manifests in numerous ways, including social exclusion, sex discrimination, hostility, androcentrism, patriarchy, male privilege, belittling of women, disenfranchisement of women, violence against women, and sexual objectification...............[Update: A post on female misogynists is now available.]MISTÄ VALLANKUMOUS ALKOI. "=dollarisetelistä
The misogynists. You may have heard of them. But what you may not realize is that they can be anywhere around you. They are notoriously hard to spot. They do not come with a label attached, and they may even come across as pro-woman.
In most cases, misogynists do not even know that they hate women. Misogyny is typically an unconscious hatred that men form early in life, often as a result of a trauma involving a female figure they trusted. An abusive or negligent mother, sister, teacher or girlfriend can plant a seed deep down in their brain’s subcortical matter.
Once planted, this seed will germinate and begin to grow, the tiny root working its way into the fear processing and memory areas of the brain as its tiny stem works its way into frontal areas of the brain, affecting emotion and rational decision-making.
The first signs of misogyny are barely noticeable, but with additional exposure to neglect, abuse, or lack of treatment, this behavioral seeding will grow larger and more prominent. But even when the misogyny reaches maturity and the tendency toward acting with hatred toward women can no longer be controlled, the misogynist and the women around him will often fail to notice the condition until it’s too late.
The following traits are typical of the misogynist:
He will zero in on a woman and choose her as his target. Her natural defenses may be down because he’s flirtatious, exciting, fun, and charismatic at first.
As time goes on, he begins to reveal a Jekyll & Hyde personality. He may change quickly from irresistible to rude, and from rude back to irresistible.
He will make promises to women and often fail to keep them. With men, on the other hand, he will almost always keep his word.
He will be late for appointments and dates with women, but be quite punctual with men.
His behavior toward women in general is grandiose, cocky, controlling, and self-centered.
He is extremely competitive, especially with women. If a woman does better than him socially or professionally, he feels terrible. If a man does better, he may have mixed feelings about it but he is able to look at the situation objectively.
He will unknowingly treat women differently from men in workplace and social settings, allowing men various liberties for which he will criticize female colleagues or friends.
He will be prepared (unconsciously) to use anything within his power to make women feel miserable. He may demand sex or withhold sex in his relationships, make jokes about women or put them down in public, “borrow” their ideas in professional contexts without giving them credit, or borrow money from them without paying them back.
On a date, he will treat a woman the opposite of how she prefers. If she is an old-style lady who prefers a "gentleman" who holds the door for her, orders for both and pays for the meal, he will treat her like one of his male buddies, order for himself, and let her pay for the whole meal if she offers (and sometimes even if she doesn’t). If she is a more independent type who prefers to order her own meal and pay for herself, he will rudely order for both and pay the check while she goes to the bathroom.
Sexually, he likes to control women and gives little or no attention to their sexual pleasure. Foreplay, if it occurs at all, is only a necessary means to an end. He likes oral sex but only as a recipient. His favorite positions enable him to avoid looking the woman in her eyes.
He will cheat on women he is dating or in a relationship with. Monogamy is the last thing he feels he owes a woman.
He may suddenly disappear from a relationship without ending it, but may come back three months later with an explanation designed to lure the woman back in.
Only rarely will a misogynist possess every one of these traits, which makes it harder to identify them. Their ability to lure women in with their charm and charisma adds to the difficulty of spotting the early-warning signs.
Women haters (unconsciously) get off on treating women badly. Every time they can put down a woman or hurt her feelings, they unconsciously feel good because deep down in their hidden brain, their bad behavior is rewarded with a dose of the pleasure chemical dopamine—which makes them want to repeat the behavior again and again.
Κυριακή 7 Ιουνίου 2020
keskustan metsisssä bysitter vol.2 @frozen_mar_d · 21t με πήραν στην δουλειά Hymyilevät kasvot hymyilevillä silmilläHymyilevät kasvot hymyilevillä silmilläHymyilevät kasvot hymyilevillä silmillä ξέρω στα παπάρια σας αλλά εγώ χάρηκα Hymyilevät kasvot
The original tweet just spots a single submarine in bosphorus.. so take it with a pinch of salt. Might very well be regular movement.Toisin kuin Syyriassa vuodesta 2011, Turkki on Libyassa sen virallisemman hallituksen puolella, ja siis laillisemmin alueella, Ranska taas Libyassa mm. Venäjän kanssa tukee Haftaria.samalla lailla usa kiusaa rasistisesti kaikkia muita valtioita kuin sen poliisi omia kansalaisiaa
military strength than the next ten countries.
Don’t forget the tear gas, bullets, armor, and training is paid for by our tax money.Misogyny is everywhere. Or at least “misogyny” is everywhere. The word, which conventionally means hatred of women, was once a radical accusation. But recently, it seems to have eclipsed the gentler “sexism” and “chauvinism” in popular use. It’s now unremarkable to find “misogyny” in a headline, much less a tweet.
On one end of the spectrum, the term is used to describe societal inequity, evidenced by things such as the gendered wage gap in the United States, the difficulties women have in finding adequate medical care and the career-destroying prerogatives of men like Les Moonves.
“Unfortunately, violent misogyny is nothing new in politics,” ran a 2018 CNN headline. “Women’s self-harm is being fueled by misogyny,” read a Guardian story last August. A New York Times Op-Ed from December explored “The Special Misogyny Reserved for Mothers.” Kim Schrier, a pediatrician running for Congress (now a Democratic congresswoman), flatly called Donald Trump “misogynist in chief” in a tweet last year.
A look at archival photographs, including those from The New York Times, shows how, as the term came into popular use, misogyny has also been a part of our visual landscape, from headline news to everyday experience.
But like so much of our current discourse, the word’s resonance drifts between the weighty and the meme-ified. One report indicated that a mongoose in Kenya might be a misogynist. “Chill with that misogyny,” reads a T-shirt available to buy on Etsy. And don’t forget the mug that features a whimsical-but-woke shark saying “I’m fin-ished with misogyny.”
Disdain for women, it is sometimes argued, is also the reason certain corners of pop culture are dismissed. “Has Internalized Misogyny Kept Me From Reading Romance Novels My Whole Life?” one writer asked. Hating the Kardashians has also been read as anti-woman, because in so doing we reduce the celebrity sisters to mere stereotypes. In the nesting-doll logic of the moment, disparaging any woman’s respite from misogyny — whether it’s reality TV, a self-care beauty regimen or astrology — is itself misogynist.
Unlock more free articles.
Create an account or log in
So, misogyny is having a moment, in more ways than one, but it also has a long history.
military strength than the next ten countries.
Don’t forget the tear gas, bullets, armor, and training is paid for by our tax money.Misogyny is everywhere. Or at least “misogyny” is everywhere. The word, which conventionally means hatred of women, was once a radical accusation. But recently, it seems to have eclipsed the gentler “sexism” and “chauvinism” in popular use. It’s now unremarkable to find “misogyny” in a headline, much less a tweet.
On one end of the spectrum, the term is used to describe societal inequity, evidenced by things such as the gendered wage gap in the United States, the difficulties women have in finding adequate medical care and the career-destroying prerogatives of men like Les Moonves.
“Unfortunately, violent misogyny is nothing new in politics,” ran a 2018 CNN headline. “Women’s self-harm is being fueled by misogyny,” read a Guardian story last August. A New York Times Op-Ed from December explored “The Special Misogyny Reserved for Mothers.” Kim Schrier, a pediatrician running for Congress (now a Democratic congresswoman), flatly called Donald Trump “misogynist in chief” in a tweet last year.
A look at archival photographs, including those from The New York Times, shows how, as the term came into popular use, misogyny has also been a part of our visual landscape, from headline news to everyday experience.
But like so much of our current discourse, the word’s resonance drifts between the weighty and the meme-ified. One report indicated that a mongoose in Kenya might be a misogynist. “Chill with that misogyny,” reads a T-shirt available to buy on Etsy. And don’t forget the mug that features a whimsical-but-woke shark saying “I’m fin-ished with misogyny.”
Disdain for women, it is sometimes argued, is also the reason certain corners of pop culture are dismissed. “Has Internalized Misogyny Kept Me From Reading Romance Novels My Whole Life?” one writer asked. Hating the Kardashians has also been read as anti-woman, because in so doing we reduce the celebrity sisters to mere stereotypes. In the nesting-doll logic of the moment, disparaging any woman’s respite from misogyny — whether it’s reality TV, a self-care beauty regimen or astrology — is itself misogynist.
Unlock more free articles.
Create an account or log in
So, misogyny is having a moment, in more ways than one, but it also has a long history.
Τρίτη 2 Ιουνίου 2020
Το όνομα του δέντρου είναι Τζακάραντα (πολύ εξωτικό!). Στη γλώσσα των Γκουαρανί, ιθαγενών της Αργεντινής, της Βραζιλίας, της Βολιβίας και της Παραγουάης από όπου κατάγεται, σημαίνει «αρωματικό». Πηγή:
too LITTLE
too fucking LATE
These cops need to face the same system, the same treatment faced by the community they abused.I know of someone who spend years in the military. After leaving, the lack of adrenaline was causing suicidal thoughts. His solution was to join the police force. Almost 1 out of 5 persons in the police force is likely looking for the adrenaline rush
peruttuja 14.6 Helsinki–Jyväskylä–Pieksämäki
S 87 Helsinki–Jyväskylä klo 14:03–17:41
S 88 Jyväskylä–Helsinki klo 18:14–21:54
IC 93 Helsinki–Jyväskylä klo 9:03–12:39
IC 86 Jyväskylä–Helsinki klo 14:23–17:54
S 81 Helsinki–Jyväskylä klo 5:03–8:40
IC 94 Jyväskylä–Helsinki klo 10:17–13:54 Peruttu ma–pe
IC/S 155 Helsinki–Pieksämäki klo 7:03–11:28 Peruttu su
S 94 Jyväskylä–Helsinki klo 10:17–13:54
S 143 Helsinki–Pieksämäki klo 10:24 –14:30 Peruttu ma–la
S 89 Tampere–Jyväskylä klo 20:07 –21:35
S 89 Tampere–Kuopio klo 20:07–23:15
IC/S 149 Helsinki–Jyväskylä klo 19:03–22:40 Peruttu la
S 91 Tampere–Jyväskylä klo 23:59–01:40
S/IC 150 Jyväskylä–Tampere klo 7:20–8:49 Ajetaan vain la
IC/S 144 Pieksämäki–Helsinki klo 12:27–16:54
S 152 Kuopio–Tampere klo 19:22–22:48 Customers at McSorley’s Old Ale House jeer at Lucy Komisar, who was among the first women to drink at the pub after the city passed a new anti-discrimination law. Prior to this, McSorley’s, which opened in 1854, had not admitted women. A waiter initially tried to bar Komisar's entry; once she was inside, some customers booed her, and another dumped a beer on her head. August 10, 1970.
Customers at McSorley’s Old Ale House jeer at Lucy Komisar, who was among the first women to drink at the pub after the city passed a new anti-discrimination law. Prior to this, McSorley’s, which opened in 1854, had not admitted women. A waiter initially tried to bar Komisar's entry; once she was inside, some customers booed her, and another dumped a beer on her head. August 10, 1970.Credit...Barton Silverman/The New York Times
PAST TENSE
What Does Misogyny Look Like?
A brief history of the #MeToo moment’s touchstone term.
Customers at McSorley’s Old Ale House jeer at Lucy Komisar, who was among the first women to drink at the pub after the city passed a new anti-discrimination law. Prior to this, McSorley’s, which opened in 1854, had not admitted women. A waiter initially tried to bar Komisar's entry; once she was inside, some customers booed her, and another dumped a beer on her head. August 10, 1970.Credit...Barton Silverman/The New York Times
By Nina Renata Aron
March 8, 2019
Misogyny is everywhere. Or at least “misogyny” is everywhere. The word, which conventionally means hatred of women, was once a radical accusation. But recently, it seems to have eclipsed the gentler “sexism” and “chauvinism” in popular use. It’s now unremarkable to find “misogyny” in a headline, much less a tweet.
On one end of the spectrum, the term is used to describe societal inequity, evidenced by things such as the gendered wage gap in the United States, the difficulties women have in finding adequate medical care and the career-destroying prerogatives of men like Les Moonves.
“Unfortunately, violent misogyny is nothing new in politics,” ran a 2018 CNN headline. “Women’s self-harm is being fueled by misogyny,” read a Guardian story last August. A New York Times Op-Ed from December explored “The Special Misogyny Reserved for Mothers.” Kim Schrier, a pediatrician running for Congress (now a Democratic congresswoman), flatly called Donald Trump “misogynist in chief” in a tweet last year.
A look at archival photographs, including those from The New York Times, shows how, as the term came into popular use, misogyny has also been a part of our visual landscape, from headline news to everyday experience.
But like so much of our current discourse, the word’s resonance drifts between the weighty and the meme-ified. One report indicated that a mongoose in Kenya might be a misogynist. “Chill with that misogyny,” reads a T-shirt available to buy on Etsy. And don’t forget the mug that features a whimsical-but-woke shark saying “I’m fin-ished with misogyny.”
Disdain for women, it is sometimes argued, is also the reason certain corners of pop culture are dismissed. “Has Internalized Misogyny Kept Me From Reading Romance Novels My Whole Life?” one writer asked. Hating the Kardashians has also been read as anti-woman, because in so doing we reduce the celebrity sisters to mere stereotypes. In the nesting-doll logic of the moment, disparaging any woman’s respite from misogyny — whether it’s reality TV, a self-care beauty regimen or astrology — is itself misogynist.
Unlock more free articles.
Create an account or log in
So, misogyny is having a moment, in more ways than one, but it also has a long history.
Editors’ Picks
Bob Dylan Has a Lot on His Mind
Can Anna Wintour Survive the Social Justice Movement?
Masks, No Kissing and ‘a Little Kinky’: Dating and Sex in a Pandemic
ImageA strip club and pornography store near Times Square. May 11, 1978.
A strip club and pornography store near Times Square. May 11, 1978.Credit...Marilynn K. Yee/The New York Times
The term emerged in the 17th century, in response to an anti-woman pamphlet written by an English fencing master named Joseph Swetnam. The 1615 tract, titled in part “The arraignment of lewd, idle, froward and unconstant women” (froward meant disobedient), was published amid early modern anxiety and debate about women’s place in society. Basically a compendium of sexist jokes, the dyspeptic work was aimed at an audience of “the ordinary set of giddy-headed young men,” and it was very popular.
“Women are crooked by nature,” Swetnam wrote, sounding like a proto-incel. To him even “the fairest woman has some filthiness in her.” Going all the way back to Eve, womankind was “no sooner made but straightway her mind was set upon mischief, for by her aspiring mind and wanton will she quickly procured man’s fall, and therefore ever since they are and have been a woe unto man, and follow the line of their first leader.” They were like pumice stones because their hearts were filled with holes, he wrote, like painted ships because they looked pretty but contained only lead. Not surprisingly, the pamphlet drew several published responses from women. In one, an anonymously written feminist play called “Swetnam the Woman-Hater, Arraigned By Women,” the character standing in for Swetnam was named Misogynos.
Misogyny was little used for the next few centuries, but its popularity skyrocketed in the mid-1970s, more or less entering the lexicon of second-wave feminism with Andrea Dworkin’s 1974 critique “Woman Hating.” In the book, Dworkin argues that a deep, ingrained prejudice against women informs aspects of society from legislation to cohabitation. As she summed it up two years later, “As women we live in the midst of a society that regards us as contemptible. We are despised … We are the victims of continuous, malevolent, and sanctioned violence against us.” (An idea familiar to women like Kathrine Switzer, pictured below, who was famously harassed as she became one of the first women to run the Boston Marathon in 1967.)
In the 1980s and ’90s, reading Dworkin became for many a discomfiting and exhilarating collegiate rite of passage. Her writing is a strident and raw look at the systemic bias affecting the everyday experiences of women. Was there actual hatred lurking beneath every meeting with your boss or commanding officer, every date, sermon, novel, TV commercial? Yes, Dworkin insisted. At the time, this was a radical idea — and to many it still is.
Image
Jock Semple, a Boston Marathon official, tried to forcibly remove Kathrine Switzer from the course. Switzer completed the marathon, but it wasn't until 1972 that women were were officially allowed to participate. April 19, 1967.
Jock Semple, a Boston Marathon official, tried to forcibly remove Kathrine Switzer from the course. Switzer completed the marathon, but it wasn't until 1972 that women were were officially allowed to participate. April 19, 1967.Credit...Paul Connell/The Boston Globe, via Getty Images
This understanding of misogyny became a commonly held idea among feminists: the issue was structural. Society was organized in a misogynistic way, even if its individual members didn’t see themselves as woman-haters. As the writer and activist Audre Lorde wrote in 1980, there is a “piece of the oppressor which is planted deep within each of us.” Susan Faludi, author of the 1991 book “Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women,” echoed this idea, arguing that efforts against equality “are encoded and internalized, diffuse and chameleonic.”
Much like “racist” — which was once mostly used to describe certain sheriffs, politicians or neighbors — misogynist is now as often applied to the system of institutions that creates an unequal America as it is to individuals. In this broadened meaning, happily married men, men with daughters and women themselves can be implicated. The way the word is now used, you don’t have to hate women to be a misogynist, despite what Webster’s dictionary still says today.
But can that one word do all this work? Can it describe some of the worst, most violent impulses in our world and everyday acts of gender bias? Should we use the same term to describe marital rape and the dearth of strong female leads on TV? It turns out, it already is, and we already are.
Some dictionaries have taken note. William Safire, the New York Times columnist who wrote for decades about the texture of our language, noted in 2008 that the Oxford English Dictionary had expanded its definition by 2002 to include “prejudice against women.” “Sexist and misogynist are now in some respects synonymous,” he wrote. “Because sexist has been so widely used, apparently misogynist — in the same sense of ‘prejudice’ rather than ‘hatred’ — now carries more force with those who are familiar with the word.”
Image
Clockwise from top left: Serena Williams at the U.S. Open, Sept. 8, 2018; Ana Maria Archila confronts Senator Jeff Flake, Sept. 28, 2018; Anita Hill at a news conference, Oct. 7, 1991; Representative Pat Schroeder announcing she would not seek the Democratic presidential nomination, Sept. 28, 1987.
Clockwise from top left: Serena Williams at the U.S. Open, Sept. 8, 2018; Ana Maria Archila confronts Senator Jeff Flake, Sept. 28, 2018; Anita Hill at a news conference, Oct. 7, 1991; Representative Pat Schroeder announcing she would not seek the Democratic presidential nomination, Sept. 28, 1987.Credit...Clockwise from top left: Elsa/Getty Images; Jim Lo Scalzo, via EPA-EFE, via Shutterstock; Scott Andersen, via Associated Press; Aaron E. Tomlinson, via Associated Press.
The word used to be a strong, personal indictment, ugly as it hit the ears. Now, it’s less harsh to hear. But paradoxically, even as the term becomes more commonplace, it has grown more trenchant. It captures the cognitive dissonance of our moment, in which women are seemingly reviled and revered, running for president and still fighting for paid maternity leave.
This roominess feels appropriate to the time, since Dworkin’s notion of misogyny, once thought radical, has become far more widely accepted.
Consider this Dworkin quote from 1997: “Women are perceived to be appalling failures when we are sad. Women are pathetic when we are angry. Women are ridiculous when we are militant. Women are unpleasant when we are bitter, no matter what the cause. Women are deranged when women want justice. Women are man-haters when women want accountability and respect from men.”
That sounds a lot like a recent Nike ad that aired during the Oscars, to a warm reception on social media. “If we show emotions, we’re called dramatic,” the voice over by Serena Williams goes. “If we want to play against men, we’re nuts. And if we dream of equal opportunity, delusional. When we stand for something, we’re unhinged. When we’re too good, there’s something wrong with us. And if we get angry, we’re hysterical, irrational or just being crazy.”
Nina Renata Aron is a writer living in Oakland, Calif. She is writing a book about addiction and love.
peruttuja 14.6 Helsinki–Jyväskylä–Pieksämäki
S 87 Helsinki–Jyväskylä klo 14:03–17:41
S 88 Jyväskylä–Helsinki klo 18:14–21:54
IC 93 Helsinki–Jyväskylä klo 9:03–12:39
IC 86 Jyväskylä–Helsinki klo 14:23–17:54
S 81 Helsinki–Jyväskylä klo 5:03–8:40
IC 94 Jyväskylä–Helsinki klo 10:17–13:54 Peruttu ma–pe
IC/S 155 Helsinki–Pieksämäki klo 7:03–11:28 Peruttu su
S 94 Jyväskylä–Helsinki klo 10:17–13:54
S 143 Helsinki–Pieksämäki klo 10:24 –14:30 Peruttu ma–la
S 89 Tampere–Jyväskylä klo 20:07 –21:35
S 89 Tampere–Kuopio klo 20:07–23:15
IC/S 149 Helsinki–Jyväskylä klo 19:03–22:40 Peruttu la
S 91 Tampere–Jyväskylä klo 23:59–01:40
S/IC 150 Jyväskylä–Tampere klo 7:20–8:49 Ajetaan vain la
IC/S 144 Pieksämäki–Helsinki klo 12:27–16:54
S 152 Kuopio–Tampere klo 19:22–22:48 Customers at McSorley’s Old Ale House jeer at Lucy Komisar, who was among the first women to drink at the pub after the city passed a new anti-discrimination law. Prior to this, McSorley’s, which opened in 1854, had not admitted women. A waiter initially tried to bar Komisar's entry; once she was inside, some customers booed her, and another dumped a beer on her head. August 10, 1970.
Customers at McSorley’s Old Ale House jeer at Lucy Komisar, who was among the first women to drink at the pub after the city passed a new anti-discrimination law. Prior to this, McSorley’s, which opened in 1854, had not admitted women. A waiter initially tried to bar Komisar's entry; once she was inside, some customers booed her, and another dumped a beer on her head. August 10, 1970.Credit...Barton Silverman/The New York Times
PAST TENSE
What Does Misogyny Look Like?
A brief history of the #MeToo moment’s touchstone term.
Customers at McSorley’s Old Ale House jeer at Lucy Komisar, who was among the first women to drink at the pub after the city passed a new anti-discrimination law. Prior to this, McSorley’s, which opened in 1854, had not admitted women. A waiter initially tried to bar Komisar's entry; once she was inside, some customers booed her, and another dumped a beer on her head. August 10, 1970.Credit...Barton Silverman/The New York Times
By Nina Renata Aron
March 8, 2019
Misogyny is everywhere. Or at least “misogyny” is everywhere. The word, which conventionally means hatred of women, was once a radical accusation. But recently, it seems to have eclipsed the gentler “sexism” and “chauvinism” in popular use. It’s now unremarkable to find “misogyny” in a headline, much less a tweet.
On one end of the spectrum, the term is used to describe societal inequity, evidenced by things such as the gendered wage gap in the United States, the difficulties women have in finding adequate medical care and the career-destroying prerogatives of men like Les Moonves.
“Unfortunately, violent misogyny is nothing new in politics,” ran a 2018 CNN headline. “Women’s self-harm is being fueled by misogyny,” read a Guardian story last August. A New York Times Op-Ed from December explored “The Special Misogyny Reserved for Mothers.” Kim Schrier, a pediatrician running for Congress (now a Democratic congresswoman), flatly called Donald Trump “misogynist in chief” in a tweet last year.
A look at archival photographs, including those from The New York Times, shows how, as the term came into popular use, misogyny has also been a part of our visual landscape, from headline news to everyday experience.
But like so much of our current discourse, the word’s resonance drifts between the weighty and the meme-ified. One report indicated that a mongoose in Kenya might be a misogynist. “Chill with that misogyny,” reads a T-shirt available to buy on Etsy. And don’t forget the mug that features a whimsical-but-woke shark saying “I’m fin-ished with misogyny.”
Disdain for women, it is sometimes argued, is also the reason certain corners of pop culture are dismissed. “Has Internalized Misogyny Kept Me From Reading Romance Novels My Whole Life?” one writer asked. Hating the Kardashians has also been read as anti-woman, because in so doing we reduce the celebrity sisters to mere stereotypes. In the nesting-doll logic of the moment, disparaging any woman’s respite from misogyny — whether it’s reality TV, a self-care beauty regimen or astrology — is itself misogynist.
Unlock more free articles.
Create an account or log in
So, misogyny is having a moment, in more ways than one, but it also has a long history.
Editors’ Picks
Bob Dylan Has a Lot on His Mind
Can Anna Wintour Survive the Social Justice Movement?
Masks, No Kissing and ‘a Little Kinky’: Dating and Sex in a Pandemic
ImageA strip club and pornography store near Times Square. May 11, 1978.
A strip club and pornography store near Times Square. May 11, 1978.Credit...Marilynn K. Yee/The New York Times
The term emerged in the 17th century, in response to an anti-woman pamphlet written by an English fencing master named Joseph Swetnam. The 1615 tract, titled in part “The arraignment of lewd, idle, froward and unconstant women” (froward meant disobedient), was published amid early modern anxiety and debate about women’s place in society. Basically a compendium of sexist jokes, the dyspeptic work was aimed at an audience of “the ordinary set of giddy-headed young men,” and it was very popular.
“Women are crooked by nature,” Swetnam wrote, sounding like a proto-incel. To him even “the fairest woman has some filthiness in her.” Going all the way back to Eve, womankind was “no sooner made but straightway her mind was set upon mischief, for by her aspiring mind and wanton will she quickly procured man’s fall, and therefore ever since they are and have been a woe unto man, and follow the line of their first leader.” They were like pumice stones because their hearts were filled with holes, he wrote, like painted ships because they looked pretty but contained only lead. Not surprisingly, the pamphlet drew several published responses from women. In one, an anonymously written feminist play called “Swetnam the Woman-Hater, Arraigned By Women,” the character standing in for Swetnam was named Misogynos.
Misogyny was little used for the next few centuries, but its popularity skyrocketed in the mid-1970s, more or less entering the lexicon of second-wave feminism with Andrea Dworkin’s 1974 critique “Woman Hating.” In the book, Dworkin argues that a deep, ingrained prejudice against women informs aspects of society from legislation to cohabitation. As she summed it up two years later, “As women we live in the midst of a society that regards us as contemptible. We are despised … We are the victims of continuous, malevolent, and sanctioned violence against us.” (An idea familiar to women like Kathrine Switzer, pictured below, who was famously harassed as she became one of the first women to run the Boston Marathon in 1967.)
In the 1980s and ’90s, reading Dworkin became for many a discomfiting and exhilarating collegiate rite of passage. Her writing is a strident and raw look at the systemic bias affecting the everyday experiences of women. Was there actual hatred lurking beneath every meeting with your boss or commanding officer, every date, sermon, novel, TV commercial? Yes, Dworkin insisted. At the time, this was a radical idea — and to many it still is.
Image
Jock Semple, a Boston Marathon official, tried to forcibly remove Kathrine Switzer from the course. Switzer completed the marathon, but it wasn't until 1972 that women were were officially allowed to participate. April 19, 1967.
Jock Semple, a Boston Marathon official, tried to forcibly remove Kathrine Switzer from the course. Switzer completed the marathon, but it wasn't until 1972 that women were were officially allowed to participate. April 19, 1967.Credit...Paul Connell/The Boston Globe, via Getty Images
This understanding of misogyny became a commonly held idea among feminists: the issue was structural. Society was organized in a misogynistic way, even if its individual members didn’t see themselves as woman-haters. As the writer and activist Audre Lorde wrote in 1980, there is a “piece of the oppressor which is planted deep within each of us.” Susan Faludi, author of the 1991 book “Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women,” echoed this idea, arguing that efforts against equality “are encoded and internalized, diffuse and chameleonic.”
Much like “racist” — which was once mostly used to describe certain sheriffs, politicians or neighbors — misogynist is now as often applied to the system of institutions that creates an unequal America as it is to individuals. In this broadened meaning, happily married men, men with daughters and women themselves can be implicated. The way the word is now used, you don’t have to hate women to be a misogynist, despite what Webster’s dictionary still says today.
But can that one word do all this work? Can it describe some of the worst, most violent impulses in our world and everyday acts of gender bias? Should we use the same term to describe marital rape and the dearth of strong female leads on TV? It turns out, it already is, and we already are.
Some dictionaries have taken note. William Safire, the New York Times columnist who wrote for decades about the texture of our language, noted in 2008 that the Oxford English Dictionary had expanded its definition by 2002 to include “prejudice against women.” “Sexist and misogynist are now in some respects synonymous,” he wrote. “Because sexist has been so widely used, apparently misogynist — in the same sense of ‘prejudice’ rather than ‘hatred’ — now carries more force with those who are familiar with the word.”
Image
Clockwise from top left: Serena Williams at the U.S. Open, Sept. 8, 2018; Ana Maria Archila confronts Senator Jeff Flake, Sept. 28, 2018; Anita Hill at a news conference, Oct. 7, 1991; Representative Pat Schroeder announcing she would not seek the Democratic presidential nomination, Sept. 28, 1987.
Clockwise from top left: Serena Williams at the U.S. Open, Sept. 8, 2018; Ana Maria Archila confronts Senator Jeff Flake, Sept. 28, 2018; Anita Hill at a news conference, Oct. 7, 1991; Representative Pat Schroeder announcing she would not seek the Democratic presidential nomination, Sept. 28, 1987.Credit...Clockwise from top left: Elsa/Getty Images; Jim Lo Scalzo, via EPA-EFE, via Shutterstock; Scott Andersen, via Associated Press; Aaron E. Tomlinson, via Associated Press.
The word used to be a strong, personal indictment, ugly as it hit the ears. Now, it’s less harsh to hear. But paradoxically, even as the term becomes more commonplace, it has grown more trenchant. It captures the cognitive dissonance of our moment, in which women are seemingly reviled and revered, running for president and still fighting for paid maternity leave.
This roominess feels appropriate to the time, since Dworkin’s notion of misogyny, once thought radical, has become far more widely accepted.
Consider this Dworkin quote from 1997: “Women are perceived to be appalling failures when we are sad. Women are pathetic when we are angry. Women are ridiculous when we are militant. Women are unpleasant when we are bitter, no matter what the cause. Women are deranged when women want justice. Women are man-haters when women want accountability and respect from men.”
That sounds a lot like a recent Nike ad that aired during the Oscars, to a warm reception on social media. “If we show emotions, we’re called dramatic,” the voice over by Serena Williams goes. “If we want to play against men, we’re nuts. And if we dream of equal opportunity, delusional. When we stand for something, we’re unhinged. When we’re too good, there’s something wrong with us. And if we get angry, we’re hysterical, irrational or just being crazy.”
Nina Renata Aron is a writer living in Oakland, Calif. She is writing a book about addiction and love.
Δευτέρα 1 Ιουνίου 2020
make sure to grab all the minutes from the antifa breakfast meetings and screenshot the zoom "team bonding" escape room exercises. Do not hurt antifa HR, she has been great with everybody.
Εγγραφή σε:
Αναρτήσεις (Atom)











